I'm a genX'er. I could never really tell if I was too old or too young to be one, but I consider my self a genX'er because that's what they (Media, parents, elders..) referred to when describing issues about the people I was interested in that were close to my age when I was growing up. One of the traits that was observed to be “genX” was a short attention span. The trait was attributed to the cable network MTV that sucked you in with 5 minute montages of images set to pop music but quickly sent you for the remote, twitching for the next stimulus. Well we all know this kind of MTV is all but dead or has re-branded itself as MTV2 (but this too is falling victim to “programing”) but the flicking seemed to remain. But is this instant gratification craving waining?
I think it is.
I look toward the same sources of stimulus that were blamed as the cause in the first place, television, film and Music. Well music isn't doing too well right now because it's become very clique. I don't think this is a bad thing in general because it means that the music appeals to a specific group really well instead of appealing to everyone half assed, but the industry is always looking for the next house hold name that every one has to have, and there's just no one that good right now so they are suffering. The great thing about not having this though is that now bands have a much more loyal fan base that will pay attention more to the progress of the band and support their efforts. Thus the first nail in the coffin of the MTV generation.
So then what about film? There's been a word thrown around so much these days that it's starting to wear on me: Trilogy. Films have gone from an hour and a half weaving of 4-6 poignant or action scenes with some dialog in between, to these gigantic epics that when taken as a whole can last for an entire day or more. Even taken on their own, the chapters of the trilogy can last twice as long as the formula that was adhered to for so long. But these films are considered to be the most appealing to this same generation that has been deemed too inattentive to accept this type of film making. This to me provides the second nail for the coffin.
Lastly there is television. One of the staple shows of the GenX is Friends. Not so much because it adhered to every other sitcom that had the stock characters who get themselves in a new funny situation every week, rather it appealed because of the story arc. Will Ross and Rachael or won't Ross and Rachael was the life blood of the Thursday night for a time with me and my friends. Shortly after this arc became the water cooler discussion it did, you start to notice other shows appearing for the GenX that no longer are new jokes written for the same people every week, but are ever evolving stories of the characters and their growth. They tried to make it appealing so you could join in any where in the story, but in reality you tuned in every week to see the new direction of the characters and the evolution of the characters that could not be observed in a single viewing. This led to a new phenomenon that is is the DVD Box set. Now you can sit and watch the entire evolution of your favorite characters in a weekend commercial free. You could just watch one episode, but like a certain potato chip, you find that you can't watch just one and the next thing you know you've spent an entire day doing noting but watching the DVD set. This new found ability to engage in a single story arc tolls the death bell for the MTV generation.
So if you'll excuse me, I'm going to finish The Lord Of The Rings: The Two Towers, special edition, watch a disc of Buffy and go out to see The Matrix again.